The Gospel Herald -- Promoting the fundamentals of the 1888 message.

 

The Knocking At The Door

The Divinely Appointed Remedies: "Gold"

Chapter 7 (continued — part 9)

  1. In the 1950’s we borrowed and endorsed the Methodist missionary E. Stanley Jones’ concepts of "righteousness by faith" and recommended them to our ministers as "safe". Jones’ concepts "would enrich one’s ministry", said The Ministry (February, 1950). Yet Jones’ preoccupation with the idea of the natural immortality of the soul causes him to confuse telepathic communication with the dead with the reception of the Holy Spirit, and also to confess that "Christ Himself has deficiencies which are to be supplied by other faiths" (The Message of Sat Tul Ashram, pp. 285, 291). It was Jones who coined the slogan, "Share Your Faith", which we eagerly adopted; but Jones meant that "this sharing means not only giving out what one has to non-Christians, but the sharing of what they have in their own faiths … Christ Himself has deficiencies" (Ibid.). What a source for our "righteousness by faith"!

We find one lone, dissenting public voice in the church paper at last protesting this borrowing from E. Stanley Jones. Elder W.A. Spicer wrote an article for the Review which was published during the summer of 1950, exposing the falseness of his ideas, mentioning Jones by name. (In the spring of 1950 he had published an article containing an oblique warning).

  1. The 1952 Bible Conference (September 1-13 in the Sligo Church) claimed to recover the 1888 message and even to go beyond it. One prominent speaker said:

To a large degree the church failed to build on the foundation laid at the 1888 General Conference. Much has been lost as a result. We are years behind. … Long ere this we should have been in the Promised Land.

But the message of righteousness by faith given in the 1888 Conference has been repeated here. Practically every speaker from the first day onward has laid great stress upon this all-important doctrine, and there was no prearranged plan that he should do so. … Truly this one subject has, in this conference "swallowed up every other".

And this great truth has been given here in this 1952 Bible Conference with far greater power than it was given in the 1888 Conference because those who have spoken here have had the advantage of much added light shining forth from hundreds of pronouncements on this subject in the writings of the Spirit of Prophecy which those who spoke back there did not have.

The light of justification and righteousness by faith shines upon us today more clearly than it ever shone before upon any people.

No longer will the question be, "What was the attitude of our workers and people toward the message of righteousness by faith that was given in 1888? What did they do bout it?" From now on the great question must be, "What did we do with the light on righteousness by faith as proclaimed in the 1952 Bible Conference?" (W.H. Branson, Our Firm Foundation, vol. 2. pp. 616, 617).

Since then over three decades have passed by — time enough to finish God’s work There was no official opposition to the 1952 message. "Practically every speaker" proclaimed it, and apparently everyone accepted it. And the speakers were the "angel of the church of the Laodiceans" — the church leadership. If the 1952 message was a true recovery of the 1888 message, the work should have been finished shortly afterward, for it was given "with far greater power" than in 1888. The 1952 brethren were "richer" than "any people" in world history! They had the "gold".

But a careful study of the 1952 messages fails to disclose the basic motifs that made the 1888 message unique. Like the 1926 messages on righteousness by faith, they present no light beyond what the church has been preaching for many decades. Somehow the truths that Ellen White endorsed in 1888 eluded our brethren of 1952. This is understandable, for with the possible exceptions of one or two they had very likely never actually studied the 1888 message in its original context. (Even today few have).

Elder Branson claimed that in spite of its lukewarmness the church had a "perfect system of truth". He failed to see that "the gospel of Christ … is the power of God unto salvation", and that if the church truly possessed the "gospel of Christ" in its fullness, the "power" would be automatic. Thus he failed to recognize the basic principle of "righteousness by faith’ — that if one has the faith, the righteousness is sure to be there too. He claimed we are rich in the very thing the True Witness says we are poor in. He expressed no need on the part of the speakers to understand true righteousness by faith, but claimed for them an "impulse by the Spirit of God’ "far greater" than Ellen White claimed for the messengers sent in 1888.

Careful motif analysis can demonstrate that the messages of the 1926 and 1952 meetings prepared the way for the current confusion of so-called "Reformationist" concepts of justification by faith in place of the unique truths divinely entrusted to Seventh-day Adventists.

If one will read through both volumes of Our Firm Foundation, where "practically every speaker … laid great stress upon this all-important doctrine [righteousness by faith]", he will find an astounding fact emerge. Not one speaker recognized the danger that the Lords servant warned of in the passage quoted above (GC 464) nor did one discern that the popular churches’ interpretation of righteousness by faith is devoid of New Testament love. No one discerned a relation between the ministry of the heavenly High Priest in the Most Holy Apartment and an understanding of true righteousness by faith. It is amazing that the following quotation from Early Writings was not referred to once:

Those who rose up with Jesus would send up their faith to Him in the holiest [the Most Holy Apartment], and pray, "My Father, give us Thy Spirit". Then Jesus would breathe upon them the Holy Ghost. In that breath was light power, and much love, joy and peace.

I turned to look at the company who were still bowed before the throne [who had not followed Christ by faith into the Most Holy Apartment]; they did not know that Jesus had left it. Satan appeared to be by the throne, trying to carry on the work of God. I saw them look up to the throne, and pray, "Father, give us Thy Spirit". Satan would then breathe upon them an unholy influence: in it there was light and much power, but no sweet love, joy and peace (EW 55, 56).

The setting of this passage is critically important, for it has a direct bearing on our understanding of the gospel itself "The company who were still bowed before the throne" is the group who rejected the sanctuary truth in the 1844 era. Although the imagery is highly symbolic, it is clear Ellen White was referring to the change in Christ’s ministry at the end of the 2300 years. Those who did not appreciate the change exposed themselves to a lethal deception — Satan masquerading as the "Christ" in a ministry which the true High Priest had now "left."

This tragic deception …

The Knocking at the Door, Table of Contents
Home  |  Articles Index  |  Bible Studies
Other materials written by this author
Contact Us