BIBLE STUDY TWO
In Order to Be Our High Priest, Christ
Must Take Our Fallen, Sinful
Nature
A. INTRODUCTION
Both Jones and Waggoner related
righteousness by faith to the unique Seventh-day Adventist view of
Christ’s Most Holy Apartment ministry as High priest in this cosmic
Day of Atonement. Their "discovery’ of this relationship
constituted the genius of their 1888-era message. Thus they established
that God has entrusted to Seventh-day Adventists a special understanding
of "the everlasting gospel" of Revelation 14 which Roman
Catholics and Sunday-keeping Protestants (including the seventh-day
keeping churches which reject the 1844 cleansing of the sanctuary)
cannot understand.
B. THE BIBLE EVIDENCE
Hebrews 1 Details and confirms His
uniqueness, the full eternal, sinless deity of Christ.
Hebrews 2 Details and confirms His
Full humanity, "made like unto" ours.
Hebrews 2:9 What do we
"see"? One who "tasted death" for us would be an
alien if He were not intimately involved, "lower than the angels,
in our sinful, mortal humanity. One with a sinless nature could not be
subject to death. 1
Hebrews 2:10, 11 Merely enduring
our physical experiences and pain (hunger, thirst, weariness) could not
"make" any one’s character "perfect;" otherwise
vast billions of suffering people would be automatically
"sanctified" thereby. 2
Hebrews 2:11-13 Again, the
"oneness" with His blood "brethren" is emphasized.
Hebrews 2:14, 15 (1) The
"careful, exceedingly careful" verb to use is
"take," or "partake of." (2) Whatever "flesh
and blood" Adam’s children "partake of," Christ
Himself likewise must "partake of." (3) The Romans 8:3 homoioma
concept is paralleled in the Creek in "likewise." (4)
"The same" further rivets the idea of identity. (5) Christ’s
"death" is intimately related to the death we "fear"
from the cradle to the grave, again demonstrating total identity. None
of these truths denies uniqueness.
Hebrews 2:16 A repetition of
Romans 1:3, except that now it’s Abraham’s, not David’s DNA that
Christ "took" (verb used twice, not "had").
Hebrews 2:17 Perfect identity required
for saving us From sin; He cannot function as effective High Priest if
He takes the sinless nature of Adam before the fall.
Hebrews 2:18 Only
"wherein" Christ has suffered our identical temptations can
His High Priestly ministry function to "succor" (help,
relieve) us in our temptations. If we are assailed by any temptation
Christ did not have to meet, in that respect we have no Saviour from
that sin. He cannot wink at continued transgression. Our dikaiomata
in the flesh is essential. 3
Hebrews 4:9, 14-16 What do we
"see"? A High Priest who (1) has taken our fallen sinful
nature and condemned sin therein; (2) One "touched" again
means identity with us in every temptation; (3) "like as we
are" again links homoioma to our identity; (4) in this
light ("therefore") we can effectively "obtain" from
Him grace to "succor" us in time of need. This is practical
godliness or dikaomata;
Hebrews 5:7, 8 Christ’s prayers
were a necessity for Him; He felt the terror of eternal death and
damnation. Having taken our fallen nature, His relationship to His
Father had to be totally by faith. Like us, He was tempted to despair.
John 4:1-3 (1) Obvious meaning of
"flesh" is fallen, sinful nature. (2) The teaching that Christ
took this "flesh" is a litmus test for divine credentials. (3)
Denial that He came with such a fallen nature equals
"antichrist," says John. 4
Revelation 5:6, etc. Twenty-five
times the Son of God is pictured as "the Lamb," showing His
close relationship with "every kindred, tongue, people, and
nation" of fallen humanity. ‘The tabernacle of God is with
men" (21:3).
Revelation 19:7-9 How could
"the Lamb" "marry" a "Bride" of a
different humanity than Himself? How otherwise could they have the
intimacy that marriage implies? Both Bridegroom and Bride must share a
common experience of "overcoming" self and bearing a cross
together.
C. SUMMARY
The whole of Scripture is ‘written for
our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come" (1
Corinthians 10:11). Hebrews has therefore been preserved for us as we
"follow the Lamb whithersoever He goeth," including following
Him into the Most Holy Apartment. There He completes His ministry of
justification by faith for His people in the setting of preparation for
His second coming.
D. CONCLUSION
The more closely Scripture is examined, the more it is seen to
confirm the message that Ellen white endorsed as "most precious,
... the gospel of His grace ... in clear and distinct lines, ... the
efficacy of the blood of Christ ... presented ... with freshness and
power, ... just what the people needed." And just what we need! This issue is
not an exercise in semantic theology. It is concerned with recovering
the message that Ellen White said must "lighten the earth with
glory." The presentation of Christ as "nigh at hand and not
afar off" is a part of that message.
Home | Index of Bible studies
| Study
Three | Articles
Notes
- The reason:
He would be like the resurrected Christ, who can never die. [return to study]
- The common
General Conference-sponsored view is that Christ took our fallen
sinful flesh or nature only in that He endured weariness, hunger,
thirst, physical weakness, as we do. [return
to study]
- The expressed
written position of a former editor of Ministry Magazine was that
Christ could not have been tempted to break the seventh commandment
due to His taking our sinless nature. This was the underlying view
that the editors of Ministry have promoted during all the years
since 1956. This false view is at the root of the serious plague of
immorality that to too great an extent afflicts ministers, members,
and youth. Such sin in the ministry creates serious loss of laity
and youth confidence. The awful worldwide plague of AIDS (often in
supposedly Christian cultures) is generally recognized as a
consequence of sexual immorality: this in turn is related to the
widespread influence of the Roman Catholic doctrine of the nature of
Christ. [return
to study]
- Jones and Waggoner both agreed that the teaching that Christ took
the sinless, unfallen nature of Adam is the essence of John’s warning
against the teaching of Antichrist (Waggoner, GCB, 1901, pp. 403-408;
Jones, The Immaculate Conception of the Virgin Blessed Mary,
1894, pp. 12, 13). [return
to study]
|